Saturday, March 28, 2020

Remixing and Education

This week, I had a powerful, eye-opening experience learning about remix culture, copyright laws, and how they pertain to education.  As an educator, my students are always transforming online materials, by making something new or different from the original, which is the definition of remix culture. Even though the origins of remixing have been around for years, 21st century students are yearning for opportunities to be creators and makers, using online media and other materials.

Remixing is an imaginative and innovative process, and with the guidance of the teacher, students can utilize their creativity and critical thinking skills, while altering existing work to construct new material. 

How should teachers and students remix safely and legally in their classrooms? Well, the answer involves understanding copyright laws and the fair use doctrine; both of which can be complicated to comprehend.

Copyright laws are confining, however, under the fair use doctrine, teachers and students can reuse online work lawfully, without permission from the copyright owner for “limited and transformative purposes” (Stim, 2016). Basically, fair use is the exception to copyright laws. According to the doctrine, there are four factors that determine fair use: purpose, nature of the copyrighted work, amount of material, and impact on the market. 

I created my own remix video to help other educators learn about fair use and how to reuse online work responsibly. It is imperative that everyone understands fair use doctrine and is respectful of all digital media and materials, so that 21st century students can utilize technology with the safety and knowledge they need.




ReferencesClearance Center. (2011, February 11). Copyright on Campus [Video file]  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UWaQK5Wbvs
Common Sense Education. (2014, September 5). Copyright and Fair Use Animation [Video file] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suMza6Q8J08
Conn, K. (2002). Copyright and the Internet in Schools. Internet and the Law. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Garcia, A. (2016). How Remixing Culture Informs Student Writing and Creativity. https://www.slj.com/?detailStory=how-remix-culture-informs-student-writing-creativity
Kimmons, R. (2016. May 11). Copyright Basics for Teachers [Video file]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9H6Ksp36q0
Naglik, M. (2020. March 27). Fair Use [Video file] https://www.wevideo.com/view/1627886983

Saturday, March 21, 2020

The Learning Journey Through Failing and Making


Failure is a fascinating concept for discussion. As an event, we never want to experience it, nor do we want to see people in our lives go through it. However, as we get older and look back at our own failures, we develop a strong appreciation for the gifts failure has given us. Many students have not yet learned the powerful role that failure experiences play in their learning. That’s where we teachers are instrumental.

Last year, I had a conversation with a parent that helped shape the way I viewed student failure. I served as a National Junior Honor Society advisor, and we had just finished the selections process. One student candidate met all pillar requirements except for scholarship. His G.P.A. did not quite meet the required threshold, and as advisors, we had to adhere to all bylaws. I was devastated to learn he had not made it and immediately called his father to give him a heads-up about the rejection letter coming home. The father’s response was something I will always remember. He said, “This is a great learning experience for my son. Sometimes in life, you don’t get what you want when you want it. Sometimes you have to work harder.” This was not the response I normally received in these situations, so I think his words impacted me even more.

This father’s insight solidified my view about failure and inspired me to ensure that I create a classroom environment where failure is a means to an end; a necessary step towards achieving a goal.  Education is a journey, and the concept of iteration is integral. Students must know when mistakes are made they will receive supportive feedback and the opportunity to try again. It’s the information gained from the errors made, that foster new knowledge. By fostering an iterative mindset, I am encouraging students to become risk-takers and innovators.

I value out-of-the-box thinking. I want my students to be creative in thought and practices. This begins with establishing trusting relationships. This is vital to implementing a safe experience for risk taking in the classroom. Purposeful dialogue, collaboration, and critical thinking are integral to my instructional framework, supporting the Constructionism theory in education. Constructionism is, “putting the learner in the center of the learning activity and having them actually construct an understanding of whatever concept we are teaching them” (Udacity, 2016). 

When students can be makers and critical thinkers while collaborating with peers, they are taking ownership of their learning.  As learning strategist, Holly Clark, says, “Teachers must be the guide on the ride” (Clark, 2019). As an educator, I must step back and provide student-driven lessons and experiences. In learning by doing, I am implementing the maker movement philosophy, and the result is, innovative thinking. I need to encourage students to be makers by providing activities, including project-based learning and Hyperdoc assignments. When teachers “pour knowledge into a student’s head, they are impeding students’ ability to participate in authentic and collaborative experiences” (Udacity, 2016).  

Seymour Papert, who pioneered the ideas behind Constructionism, stated, “The role of the teacher is to create the conditions for invention rather than provide ready-made knowledge” (Roffey, 2016). With this idea in mind, along with elements of the Constructivist theory, such as scaffolding and social participation (O’Donnell, 2012), I, as a 21st century educator, must utilize educational technology tools in a way that closes Richard Culatta’s “digital divide” (Culatta, 2013) and encourages students to be creators. In addition to educators, administrators can facilitate this implementation by providing training that will give us the tools we need to utilize “technology to reimage learning” (Culatta, 2013). 

As an educator, I must  model safety in taking risks and leaving my comfort zone.  Remembering that I, too, am a lifelong learner and by maintaining a mindset of continued growth, my students will benefit from all that 21st century learning has to offer. There will, of course, be growing pains on my part. This brings us back to the experience of failure. In a setting where failure is viewed as an opportunity for growth, both my students and myself, some pretty amazing outcomes are inevitable.



References
Clark, H. (2019). Chromebook Infused Classroom Online Course. Infused Classroom. https://infusedclassroom.teachable.com/
Culatta. R. [Tedx Talks] (2013, January 10) Reimagining Learning: Richard Culatta at TEDx  Beacon Street [Video file]. https://www.youtube.com/watch v=Z0uAuonMXrg&feature=emb_logo
O’Donnell, A.M.  (2012). Constructivism. American Psychological Association, 1(3), 4-9.  https://psycnet-apa-org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/fulltext/2011-11701-003.pdf
Roffey, T. (2016). Constructionism & Constructivism. Makerspace for Education. http://www.makerspaceforeducation.com/constructionism--constructivism.html
Udacity. (2016, June 6). Constructionism [Video file]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qsiqetMlCgLoading...




Loading...



Final NLP

Swinging Into Something New  Yesterday, I went putt-putt golfing while on vacation, in South Carolina. It was my family’s first venture outs...